These comprise:
| |
Dec.
31, 2004 |
Dec.
31, 2005 |
| |
Total |
of which
current |
Total |
of
which
current |
| EUR million |
|
|
|
|
| Provisions for taxes |
997 |
648 |
803 |
431 |
| Provisions for personnel commitments |
1,261 |
692 |
1,485 |
837 |
| Provisions for environmental remediation |
249 |
41 |
279 |
81 |
| Provisions for restructuring |
163 |
152 |
92 |
83 |
| Provisions for trade-related commitments |
593 |
587 |
648 |
641 |
| Miscellaneous provisions |
648 |
587 |
1,042 |
936 |
| |
3,911 |
2,707 |
4,349 |
3,009 |
The expected disbursements out of the provisions recognized
in the 2004 and 2005 balance sheets are as follows:
| Expected disbursements |
Dec.
31, 2004
|
| EUR million |
|
| 2005 |
2,707 |
| 2006 |
374 |
| 2007 |
63 |
| 2008 |
43 |
| 2009 |
30 |
| 2010 or later |
694 |
| |
3,911 |
|
|
| Expected disbursements |
Dec.
31, 2005
|
| EUR million |
|
| 2006 |
3,009 |
| 2007 |
231 |
| 2008 |
125 |
| 2009 |
81 |
| 2010 |
229 |
| 2011 or later |
674 |
| |
4,349 |
|
Changes in provisions were as follows:
| |
Jan.
1, 2005 |
Changes
in scope of
consoli-
dation |
Currency
effects |
Allo-
cations |
Uti-
lization |
Reversal |
Dec. 31, 2005 |
| EUR million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Taxes |
997 |
(7) |
69 |
438 |
(355) |
(339) |
803 |
| Personnel commitments |
1,261 |
5 |
52 |
915 |
(681) |
(67) |
1,485 |
| Environmental remediation |
249 |
– |
16 |
53 |
(30) |
(9) |
279 |
| Restructuring |
163 |
– |
10 |
70 |
(124) |
(27) |
92 |
| Trade-related commitments |
593 |
0 |
57 |
969 |
(898) |
(73) |
648 |
| Miscellaneous |
648 |
11 |
60 |
829 |
(417) |
(89) |
1,042 |
| Total |
3,911 |
9 |
264 |
3,274 |
(2,505) |
(604) |
4,349 |
The provisions are partly offset by claims for refunds in the amount
of EUR 116 million, which are recognized as receivables. These relate
mainly to environmental measures and to claims out of the provisions
for legal risks. The miscellaneous provisions contain provisions in
the amount of EUR 663 million (2004: EUR 226 million) for significant
legal risks. Further details of legal risks are given in Note [35].
Personnel commitments mainly include annual bonus payments, vacation
entitlements, service awards and other personnel costs. Also reflected
here are the obligations under the stock-based compensation programs.
29.1 Stock-based compensation
Stock-based compensation in the Bayer Group is granted primarily under
standard programs and also on an individual-agreement basis.
Individual agreements enable the company to link remuneration components
to the stock price or future stock price trends. Awards under such agreements
may be contingent upon the attainment of agreed targets, or they may
be based solely on length of service.
Standard programs exist for different groups of employees. The program
offered to members of the Board of Management and other senior executives
from 2000 through 2004 was essentially a stock option program with
variable stock-based awards. This program provides for cash payments.
Middle managers and other groups of employees were offered a stock incentive
program or a stock participation program, respectively.
A new stock-based compensation program for top management, known as “Aspire,” was
introduced in 2005. It comprises two variants which are described
below. For other managers and non-managerial employees, a different type
of stock participation program was offered in 2005, under which Bayer
subsidizes employee purchases of shares in the company.
As with other remuneration systems involving cash settlement, awards
to be made under the stock-based programs are covered by provisions
in the amount of the fair value of the obligations currently existing
toward the respective groups of employees. Changes in provisions relating
to all existing stock-based compensation programs are, or have been,
recognized in the income statement.
In the past, these programs were measured on the basis of intrinsic
value. Starting in 2005, measurement is based on fair value,
and prior periods have therefore been restated accordingly. The change
affected provisions as follows:
| |
Stock
option
program |
Stock
incentive program |
Stock
participation program |
| EUR million |
|
|
|
Intrinsic value as of
December 31, 2004 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
| One-time remeasurement effect |
1 |
1 |
5 |
Fair value as of
January 1, 2005 |
3 |
2 |
6 |
The table below shows the change in provisions for the various programs:
| |
Stock
option
program |
Stock
incentive program |
Stock
participation program |
Aspire I |
Aspire II |
| EUR million |
|
|
|
|
|
| January 1, 2005 |
3 |
2 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
| Allocations |
10 |
1 |
6 |
11 |
23 |
| Utilization |
– |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Reversal |
0 |
0 |
(1) |
0 |
0 |
| December 31, 2005 |
13 |
3 |
11 |
11 |
23 |
Total expenses for stock-based compensation programs in 2005 were EUR 57
million (2004: EUR 8 million), including EUR 34 million for the new
Aspire programs introduced in 2005 and EUR 2 million in subsidies for
the 2005 short-term stock participation program (2004: EUR 4 million).
In 2005 provisions of EUR 4 million were recorded in the financial
statements at the fair value of obligations entered into under individual
stock-based compensation agreements. The obligations were measured
in the same way as those incurred for the standard programs.
The fair value of obligations under the standard stock-based compensation
programs and individual agreements has been calculated using the
Monte Carlo simulation method using the following key parameters:
| |
| |
|
| Dividend yield |
2.27
% |
| Risk-free interest rate |
2.92
% |
| Volatility of Bayer stock |
38.00
% |
| Volatility of the EURO STOXX 50SM |
19.55
% |
| Correlation between Bayer stock price
and the EURO STOXX 50SM |
0.56
% |
The expected exercise period is three to five years.
Long-term incentive
program for members of the Board of Management and
other senior executives (Aspire I)
To participate in Aspire I, members of the Board
of Management and other senior executives are required
to purchase a certain number of Bayer shares that
is predetermined according to specific guidelines
and to retain them for the full term of the program.
A percentage of their annual base salary is defined
as a target for variable payments (“Aspire
target opportunity”). Depending on the performance
of Bayer stock, both in absolute terms and relative
to the EURO STOXX 50SM benchmark index, participants
are granted an award of between 0 and 200 percent
of their individual target opportunity.
Participants may ask for their Aspire award to be
paid out in cash immediately at the end of the three-year
performance period, or they may convert it into “performance
units”. These can then be redeemed within a
two-year exercise period for a cash payment that
depends on the Bayer stock price on the exercise
date.
Long-term incentive program for middle management (Aspire II)
A variant of the Aspire program with the following modifications is also
offered to middle management:
- No personal investment in Bayer shares is required.
- The amount of the award in relation to the employee’s personal
Aspire target opportunity is based entirely on the absolute performance
of Bayer stock during the performance period.
- The award varies between 0 and 150 percent of the Aspire target
opportunity.
This variant of the Aspire program is thus not linked to the EURO
STOXX 50SM index.
Stock Participation Program (2005) for other managers and
non-managerial employees
Under this program, Bayer offered employees the opportunity
to purchase shares at a discount as follows:
- up to 30 Bayer shares at a discount of EUR 6.75
per share
- additional Bayer shares at a 15 percent discount
up to a maximum total value of EUR 2,500
Managers not eligible to participate in the Aspire program
could purchase shares at a 15 percent discount up to
a maximum value of EUR 4,000.
The shares purchased under the 2005 program must be held
in a special deposit account and may not be sold before
December 31, 2006. Employees acquired a total of 523,072
Bayer shares under the 2005 Stock Participation Program.
Stock-based compensation programs 2000–2004
The stock-based compensation programs offered to the different employee
groups in 2000 through 2004 were all similar in structure. Provisions
for the obligations under these programs are recorded in the balance
sheet at fair value and recognized in the income statement. Entitlement
to awards under these programs depends on an initial investment in
Bayer stock being retained for their duration.
The table shows the programs applicable through December 31, 2004:
| |
Stock
option
program |
Stock
incentive program |
Stock
participation program |
| Year of issue |
2000-2004 |
2000-2004 |
2000-2004 |
| Original term in years |
5 |
10 |
10 |
| Retention period / distribution date in years from issue date |
3 |
2/6/10 |
2/6/10 |
| Reference price |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Performance criteria |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Stock Option Program (2000–2004)
A maximum personal investment in Bayer stock was defined for each Board
of Management member or other senior executive who wished to participate
in the Stock Option Program.
Here, too, there is a three-year retention period followed by a two-year
exercise period, after which any option rights not exercised expire.
Eligibility to exercise option rights and the award to which the holder
is entitled depend on the absolute and relative performances of Bayer
AG stock.
For the tranches issued in 2000–2002, every participant received
one option for every 20 shares placed in a special account (personal
investment). Each option originally could reach a maximum value of
200 shares during the term of the tranche, depending on the performance
of Bayer stock, both in absolute terms and relative to the benchmark
index, the EURO STOXX 50SM.
For the tranches issued in 2003 and 2004, participants received up
to three options per share of their personal investments. For each
option, a cash payment – equivalent to the market price of one Bayer share – and
an outperformance premium are awarded at the exercise date subject to
the attainment of certain performance and outperformance targets, respectively.
The stock options issued under the 2001 and 2002 tranches
can currently be exercised. However, on the reporting date their intrinsic
value was zero.
Stock Incentive Program (2000–2004)
To take part in this program, each participant was required to deposit
shares with a maximum aggregate value of half his or her performance-related
bonus for the preceding fiscal year. The incentive award depends on
the number of Bayer shares deposited at the launch of each tranche
and the overall performance of Bayer stock. The Stock Incentive Program
differs from the Stock Option Program in that participants may sell
their shares during the term of the program, although any shares sold
do not count for the purpose of incentive awards on subsequent distribution
dates. The Stock Incentive Program runs for a ten-year period, during
which there are three incentive payment dates.
Incentive payments under the program are only made if Bayer stock has
outperformed the Dow Jones EURO STOXX 50SM index by the respective
distribution dates. For every ten Bayer shares originally placed in their
deposit account and retained until the distribution date, participants
then receive payments equal to the values of two shares after two years,
four shares after six years and four shares after ten years.
Stock Participation Program (2000–2004)
Under the Stock Participation Program, only half as many shares are
allocated per ten shares deposited as under the Stock Incentive Program,
but allocation does not depend on any performance criteria.
29.2 Environmental protection
The Group’s activities are subject to extensive laws and regulations
in the jurisdictions in which it does business and maintains properties.
Compliance with environmental laws and regulations may require Bayer
to remove or mitigate the effects of the disposal or release of chemical
substances at various sites. Under some of these laws and regulations,
a current or previous owner or operator of property may be held liable
for the costs of removal or remediation of hazardous substances on, under,
or in its property, without regard to whether the owner or operator knew
of, or caused the presence of the contaminants, and regardless of whether
the practices that resulted in the contamination were legal at the time
they occurred. As many of the production sites have an extended history
of industrial use, it is impossible to predict precisely what effect
these laws and regulations will have on the Group in the future.
As is typical for companies involved in the chemical and related industries,
soil and groundwater contamination has occurred in the past at some of
the sites, and might occur or be discovered at other sites. Group companies
are subject to claims brought by United States Federal or State regulatory
agencies and other private entities and individuals regarding the remediation
of sites that they own, formerly owned or operated, where materials were
produced specifically for them by contract manufacturers or where waste
from their operations was treated, stored or disposed of.
In particular, a potential liability exists under the U.S. Federal Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, commonly known
as “Superfund,” the U.S. Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act and related state laws for investigation and remediation costs at
a number of sites. At most of these sites, numerous companies, including
Bayer, have been notified that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
state governing body or private individuals consider such companies to
be potentially responsible parties under Superfund or related laws. At
other sites, Bayer is the sole responsible party. The proceedings relating
to these sites are in various stages. In most cases remediation measures
have already been initiated.
Provisions for environmental remediation as of December 31, 2005 amounted
to EUR 279 million (2004: EUR 249 million). The material components
of the provisions for environmental remediation costs primarily relate
to land reclamation, rehabilitation of contaminated sites, recultivation
of landfills, and redevelopment and water protection measures. The provisions
for environmental remediation costs are recorded on a discounted basis
where environmental assessments or clean-ups are probable, the costs
can be reasonably estimated and no future economic benefit is expected
to arise from these measures. The above amount of provisions represents
anticipated future remediation payments totaling EUR 363 million (2004: EUR 294
million), discounted at risk-free average rates of between 3.0 percent
and 7.0 percent. These discounted amounts will be paid out over the period
of remediation of the relevant sites, which is expected to be 20 years.
Further information on the inherent difficulties involved in accurately
estimating environmental obligations is provided in Note [5].
29.3 Restructuring charges
Restructuring charges of EUR 162 million were incurred in 2005 for
closures of facilities and relocation of business activities, including EUR 67
million in provisions that are expected to be utilized as the respective
restructuring measures are implemented. The total charges include EUR 50
million in severance payments, a total EUR 59 million in accelerated
amortization/depreciation and write-downs of intangible assets, property,
plant and equipment, and EUR 53 million in other expenses. Most of
the charges taken for severance payments and other expenses in 2005 will
lead to disbursements in 2006.
Provisions for restructuring still contained EUR 9 million from the
previous year’s allocation for restructuring projects in the Pharmaceuticals
Division, some of which relate to the strategic alliance with Schering-Plough.
This amount is mainly for severance payments and for obligations under
supply and service arrangements. Further, as a result of more recent
assessments of the market position of certain marketing licenses in the
United States, the useful life of the corresponding intangible assets
has been reduced and inventories have been written down, leading to additional
expenses of EUR 18 million.
In connection with the restructuring of the pharmaceuticals site in Wuppertal,
Germany, a former Lipobay facility was written down by EUR 5 million
in 2005. Further costs of EUR 5 million were incurred in addition.
In 2004, expenses of EUR 24 million were incurred for severance payments
in connection with the restructuring of the research center in Wuppertal,
Germany.
The building use plan for the West Haven, Connecticut, site in the United
States was reviewed in the third quarter of 2005, and it was determined
that Bayer has no further use for two of the buildings because of site
consolidation. An impairment test was carried out on these buildings
by comparing their residual carrying amounts to their fair value less
costs to sell, resulting in a write-down of EUR 12 million.
At the end of the third quarter of 2005 it was decided to relocate the
headquarters of the Diabetes Care Division in the United States from
Elkhart, Indiana, to Tarrytown, New York. This relocation, which is scheduled
for completion by the end of 2006, affects about 160 employees. In this
connection, a write-down of EUR 12 million was taken for the buildings in Elkhart used by this
division, as no other use can be found for them. Provisions of EUR 7
million were recorded for severance payments to employees.
As a result of the reorganization of the Diabetes Care and Molecular
Testing Systems activities at the Berkeley, California, and Walpole,
Massachusetts, sites in the United States, additional expenses of EUR 3 million were incurred for severance payments (2004: EUR 7 million).
Following the decision made in the second quarter of 2005 to further
reorganize the Bayer CropScience business in France, provisions of EUR 23
million were established for restructuring charges, consisting largely
of personnel expenses for social plans. The reorganization affects virtually
all functions at the relevant companies and includes the relocation of
accounting activities. The restructuring provisions as of December 31,
2005 totaled EUR 33 million.
As part of the site consolidation at Bayer CropScience in the United
States, the Environmental Science and Seed Treatment activities at the
Montvale, New Jersey, and Birmingham, Alabama, sites are being transferred
to Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, where the U.S. subsidiary
of Bayer CropScience is headquartered. A provision of EUR 12 million
was recorded for this relocation. Of this amount, EUR 7 million
is for personnel expenses and most of the remainder for infrastructure
measures.
An additional EUR 4 million provision was recorded for personnel
and infrastructure measures and the transfer of administrative functions
as a result of closing a CropScience site in Hauxton, United Kingdom,
and the relocation of manufacturing operations to other sites. Expenses
of EUR 13
million were recognized in this connection in 2004.
Following the decision to shut down the U.S. production site for TDI
in New Martinsville, West Virginia, a EUR 9 million write-down was
recognized on assets that can no longer be utilized. The continuing reorganization
of the MaterialScience business, which began in 2002, led to additional
expense of EUR 4 million for severance payments. The other expenses
include EUR 33 million relating to a contractual purchase obligation.
Current overcapacity has made it unlikely that the agreement concerned
will be utilized.
Further ongoing restructuring programs to improve the profitability of
the subgroups and integrate acquisitions gave rise to total expenses
of EUR 15 million, comprising EUR 3 million in severance payments, EUR 1
million in write-downs and EUR 11 million in other charges.
Changes in provisions for restructuring were as follows:
| |
Severance payments |
Other costs |
Total |
| EUR million |
|
|
|
| Status, January 1, 2005 |
103 |
60 |
163 |
| Additions |
50 |
20 |
70 |
| Utilization |
(121) |
(30) |
(151) |
| Exchange differences |
9 |
1 |
10 |
| Status, December 31, 2005 |
41 |
51 |
92 |
The other costs are mainly demolition expenses and other charges related
to the abandonment of production facilities.
|